Search for: "PARK v SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT"
Results 81 - 100
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Hillside Memorial Park and Mortuary v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
This case presents issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under the California Environmental Quality Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:23 pm
Hansen In Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
That year, it held in Bowers v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am
Today, a Second Circuit panel (Livingston, Park, Menashi) decided the consolidated cases of Agudath Israel of America v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
H034535 (Sixth Dist., June 10, 2011). [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm
When two officers arrived on scene, the man was outside next to a car in the parking lot. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
McCoy, No. 06-4850 "Grant of a motion to suppress evidence seized after the detention and search of the defendant in a grocery store parking lot is reversed and remanded where the searching officer possessed a reasonable, articulable suspicion that defendant was engaged in serious criminality when the officer stopped and frisked him. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
DeCarr that Lisa might be living in a trailer park which is across the street. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
This case presents issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under the California Environmental Quality Act. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
This case presents issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under the California Environmental Quality Act. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
,” citing Utah v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
LEXIS 5809, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County (Ohio Ct. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 667 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
” Both the district court and the 9th Circuit concluded that the deputies could be held liable under the provocation doctrine. [read post]
