Search for: "PARK v SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT" Results 81 - 100 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit from 1966 to 1977, at which point he was appointed U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Brad Hughes
The Sixth District Court of Appeal, however, reversed—holding that the Arbitrators’ award must be confirmed in its entirety — including Falfas’s reinstatement. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The 14th District Agricultural Association operates the Santa Cruz County fairgrounds outside of Watsonville. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The sixth cause of action alleged a violation of Fish and Game Code section 5515 because the projects would result in the prohibited take of the unarmored threespine Stickleback (stickleback). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
  The Michigan statute does not “immunize” drug manufacturers like they are diplomats who freely ignore parking laws. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:13 pm by Rumpole
 Rumpole practice tip #19: Be aware of Wilson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:39 am by Kevin LaCroix
The cert petitions of the Proskauer Rose and Chadbourne & Parke law firms can be found here and here, respectively. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2012) 200 Cal.App.4th 1480: The Sixth Appellate District upheld the use of a variable baseline in Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:37 am by Brian Wolfman
” The Ninth Circuit agreed with the district court (and the Sixth Circuit) that the term “interpreters” in the statute includes, as the panel put it, “costs for services required to interpret either live speech or written documents. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:13 am by WSLL
However, the argument that judicial imposition of consecutive sentences violates the Sixth Amendment has been soundly rejected by the courts and therefore, Appellant’s contention is rejected.Appellant’s second issue is a variation on his first. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio bucked that trend on July 6, 2011, in his ruling in EEOC v. [read post]