Search for: "PARKER v. WASHINGTON" Results 81 - 100 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2017, 5:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tulalip Tribes of Washington (Tribal Taxation – Real Estate)Redding Rancheria v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am by Cormac Early
 Continuing a theme raised by Kathleen Parker in the Washington Post (covered in yesterday’s round-up), several commentators discuss efforts to influence the Court’s decision. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
State and Federal Hospice Audit and Investigation Efforts are Expanding in 2022 (May 12, 2022): Hospice agencies are again the focus of both state and federal investigators and prosecutors around the country. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
At the same time, the Court will consider a cross-appeal, Parker v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Donahue has posted to SSRN her history-laden amicus curiae brief in FBI v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The Washington Post, Ashley Parker and others report that although “[f]or nearly eight months, President Trump has boasted that appointing Neil M. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
  An earlier iteration of the case was GVR’d and returned to the Sixth Circuit in light of the Court’s per curiam decision in Parker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
The city of Washington’s appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
The city of Washington's appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Richard W. Parker
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am by Robert Liles
Mobile Dentistry in Texas – An Overview of Regulatory Risk Areas to be Considered(December 7, 2018):  Each state sets their own licensure requirements, rules and regulations regarding the practice of dentistry, all of which are subject to change. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
Medicare Exclusion Risks: Employing Excluded Individuals Can Result in Significant Administrative, Civil and / or Criminal Liabilities (May 8, 2023): One of the most severe administrative sanctions available under the Social Security Act stems from the authority of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[1] to “exclude” individuals and entities from participating in Federal health care programs.[2] While the… [read post]