Search for: "PORTFOLIO TECHNOLOGIES V ITC" Results 81 - 84 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
ITC, 805 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
My blog posts yesterday about the limitations of Apple's ability to lay exclusive claim to modern-day computing technologies -- "10 European judges found Apple had not invented slide-to-unlock (star patent at Samsung trial)" and "In 49 months of holy war, Apple has not proved that it owns any feature other than rubber-banding" -- have already been read widely and they have sparked some debate.All in all, I'm very happy about the reactions I received (and 10% of moronic emails don't matter).… [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]