Search for: "PRO IS, INC." Results 81 - 100 of 5,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc., 2023 VT 65. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Mervyn’s Stores, the applicant in pro per filed a petition for disqualification following a hearing on 12/29/22, alleging that the judge’s concern for a family member’s health had compromised the judge’s “cognitive and memory processes” and further that his trial directions and demeanor indicated the appearance of bias or actual bias against the applicant. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Hong Kong Media tycoon and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai has pleaded not guilty to all charges as his trial continues in Hong Kong this week. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Meghan Conroy
During the course of its 18-month investigation, the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Wildflower Preschool bordered and shared an access easement with the adjacent Merritt's Gravel Pit, Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
W.C.A.B., Lexis Workers’ Compensation Judges—Disqualification—WCAB denied pro per applicant’s Petition to Disqualify WCJ based on allegations that WCJ’s decision demonstrated bias or appearance of bias “shown by the vocabulary and symbols used and that the name ‘Debra Sandoval’ is controversial and is associated with organized stalking and privacy invasions,” when WCAB reasoned that... [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Home Depot, Inc., No. 11 WAP 2022 (Pa. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
  On November 20, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc., together known as Kraken, with operating Kraken’s trading platform as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]