Search for: "PROCESS ENGINEERING AND MACHINE CO INC" Results 81 - 100 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2011, 7:24 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,754,023 entitled COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS USING A MICROORGANISM CONCENTRATE FOR PAINT OVERSPRAY REMOVAL PROCESSES and owned by PPG Industries Ohio. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:06 pm by @ErikJHeels
(Topsfield, MA; George Vasiliades, President) Boston Endoscopic Engineering Corporation (Danvers, MA; Christopher Thompson, President) Boston Engineering Group, Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court Finds USDA Violated Federal Law by Allowing Genetically Engineered Sugar Beets On The Market. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Waltham, MA; Michele Bowman, President) Angelina's Pastry Corporation (Arlington, MA; Angela Mascioli, President) Anorak Corporation (Boston, MA; Aaron Gowell, President) Apollo Processing, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Process must pass "machine or transformation" test to be patentable. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46)   United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:43 pm by ~
The final rule set forth: (1) that a requestfor exclusion must be accompanied by evidence that willmeet the statutory test for the exclusion outlined above;and (2) that the EXHR staff would evaluate the evidence andprovide a scientific recommendation to the Commission as towhether the party submitting the request had met thisstatutory test.The Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA),Polaris Industries, Inc., American Suzuki MotorCorporation, Arctic Cat Inc., Bombardier… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka v Axelrod (IP… [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:19 am
The defendants relied upon a prior art document published by the Internet Engineering Task Force and IBM (known as the iKP reference) which discussed two different models for processing credit card transactions on the Internet. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Why compulsory licenses are bad: a look at the sausage making process: (Techdirt) More on ACTA: (LawFont.com) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Brand Finance 500: the annual report on the world’s most valuable brands: (IP finance), Gretchen Olive’s ‘10 steps to an effective domain name policy’: (IPwar’s), ICANN approves GNSO proposals imposing financial penalty on registrars who engage in… [read post]