Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2007, 1:15 pm
Last Thursday, the Third Department affirmed a dismissal of the action in New York State Assn. of Small City School Dists., Inc. v State of New York, 2007 NY Slip Op 05822. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
” (Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
Bean, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:34 pm
By Jason Rantanen Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
Property of Marvel Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:39 am
In the case, Move Press, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm
CMH Homes, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said the issue here is whether renewal applications for four properties located in the Village of Freeport, Nassau County, are entitled to tax exemption pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 462. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
Jackson of the Eastern District of Virginia relied heavily upon the four-part test set forth by the United States Supreme Court in the case of ebay, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Alloy Steel, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:28 pm
The Seventh Circuit in Schrock v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:14 pm
King Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 11:08 am
Yesterday, in Vucetovic v Epsom Downs, Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 06577 the First Department held that a tree well does not constitute part of the sidewalk, and thus, an abutting landowner is not responsible for maintaining the tree well. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:43 pm
Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act -- Settlement agreement -- Trial court was without jurisdiction to review and approve settlement agreement which was entered into more than four years after property owners had filed suit seeking compensation under Bert Harris Act -- Settlement agreement did not comply with presuit settlement timeline set forth in statute, and presuit settlement procedures were not available to parties at time they entered into… [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Carranza v Nordstrom Inc., 2014 WL 10537816 (C. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
28 May 2021, 4:00 am
Lauderdale, Inc. v. [read post]
