Search for: "Parcell v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2025, 4:05 am
In Calvary Temple Church of Evansville, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 9:22 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:31 pm
The record set forth that the State valued the parcels separately and allotted the highest and best use to each of them. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:45 am
For the Oregon hypothetical, the solicitor general explains that states never have immunity in the courts of the other states, pointing to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Nevada v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 5:51 am
The gloss thus harmonized "manifest disregard" with the holding that the Arbitration Act states the "exclusive" grounds for vacatur in Hall Street Assocs., L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:00 am
Background In Amber Ibarra v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:11 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., --- F.R.D. ----, 2007 WL 2077709 (W.D. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, in a recent case, McQuistion v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 12:39 pm
Bensalem Masjid, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:37 am
The appellate court affirmed stating that a local planning board has broad discretion in deciding applications for subdivision approval. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:44 am
United States, No. 07-5191 (D.C. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:00 am
In AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 10:20 pm
Manuel Barba v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:28 pm
Fryeburg Trust v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:12 am
Perry v Zoning Board of Appeals of Hull, 2021 WL 2932855 (MA App. 7/13/2021) [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 4:16 pm
Zweber v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
That development never came to fruition, and the subject parcel was rezoned in 1976. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
In Cloverleaf Realty of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:17 pm
As to the issue of notice, even though the notice given here did not state that the proposed ordinance would repeal Local Law No. 2 (1970) of the Town of Clifton Park, the notice did state that the proposed ordinance would amend the zoning ordinance in relation to two business districts and identified the geographical area that would be affected, which included the CCA parcel. [read post]
