Search for: "Parks v. Planning & Zoning Commission"
Results 81 - 100
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2016, 8:54 pm
However, because Prop D was a municipal initiative on a wholly municipal matter, it was properly enacted without a planning commission hearing. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
" Armstrong v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:16 pm
The City’s zoning code does not require Plan Commission approval for certain “permitted uses” in neighborhood shopping districts, such as grocery stores, restaurants, and theaters, but does require such approval for “conditional uses,” such as churches. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Newhall Ranch Specific Plan (the specific plan) On May 27, 2003, the County of Los Angeles approved the Newhall Ranch “specific plan” that includes a broad range of residential, mixed-use and non-residential land uses within five villages, allowing for up to 21,308 dwelling units (including 423 second units), 629 acres of mixed-use development, 67 acres of commercial uses, 249 acres of business park land uses, 37 acres of visitor-serving uses, 1,014… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
Residents Against Specific Plan 380 v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
In the 1968 zoning document, the City Planning Commission granted the zoning application because “the city gains what amounts to a permanent open park…it is principally because of this public benefit that the Commission has viewed this application with favor. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The court then analyzed the opposition’s “unusual circumstances” argument, finding that there was nothing unusual about the facts surrounding water quality, surrounding zoning and land uses or as to the scope of the activity. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:49 am
The park was zoned “rural residential. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 7:49 pm
Friends of McMillan Park v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
For publication opinions 1/22/08 (6): In City of Charlestown Advisory Planning Commission v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
Parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits (sec. 132(f))28. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am
At a later May 13, 2020 hearing, the East Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (Planning Commission), acting in its capacity as a Zoning Administrator and Board of Zoning Adjustment, also adopted the previously prepared MND, approved various zoning determinations and adjustments needed for the project’s retaining walls, and recommended the City Council adopt the necessary zone change. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
Petitioner filed suit on both CEQA and Planning and Zoning grounds. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:38 am
Now that green buildings and renewable energy installations are becoming more commonplace, city councils and planning commissions will be forced to weigh the environmental impact of competing development. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
California State Lands Commission (September 17, 2015, A141696, A141697) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
” (CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(b), (c); National Parks & Conservation Assn. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
” (Citing San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
