Search for: "Parks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 81 - 100
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
HARDENING PERIOD A French insolvency administrator, a creditors’ representative (mandataire judiciaire) or the criminal pro [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
IPSO IPSO had a blog post “Social media and journalism during COVID-19”. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
The case is all the more striking because more than a century ago, in Jacobson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 10:53 am
The only people allowed to be outside their cars were the pastor, the videographer, and security personnel, and the pastor and videographer said they would "remain a very safe distance from your cars. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
The Court ruled that the Park was a public forum and that the rules which prohibited free speech and petitions in the Park violated the right to free speech under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.GeorgiaKatamadze v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
United States Netflix has won a defamation case for the show When They See Us, which tells the story of the Central Park Five. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:21 pm
GermanyBILD v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
The following is our testimony to Kansas’ Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation; and Kansas’ House Committee on Taxation Presenting: Kansas Tax Modernization: A Framework for Stable, Fair, Pro-growth Reform Table of Contents Introduction Corporate Income Tax Individual Income Tax State and Local Sales Tax Property and Related Taxes Other Tax and Revenue Introduction Thank you for inviting us to present today before your committee, and for the openness and hospitality we… [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals sustained the Workers’ Compensation Board's ruling that Officer was engaged in a "special errand" at the time he was injured and thus eligible for Workers' Compensation benefits.* See Retirement and Social Security Law §363-c[b][1].The Claimant's decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_09079.htm [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm
The ACLU is currently suing to end the MPP, with the 9th Circuit having heard arguments in the case, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Comptroller discounted Petitioner's experts opinions for various reasons and rejected Petitioner's citing determinations made by the Workers' Compensation Board and the Social Security Administration, explaining that the opinions of those entities "are not binding upon the Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Comptroller discounted Petitioner's experts opinions for various reasons and rejected Petitioner's citing determinations made by the Workers' Compensation Board and the Social Security Administration, explaining that the opinions of those entities "are not binding upon the Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Comptroller discounted Petitioner's experts opinions for various reasons and rejected Petitioner's citing determinations made by the Workers' Compensation Board and the Social Security Administration, explaining that the opinions of those entities "are not binding upon the Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Comptroller discounted Petitioner's experts opinions for various reasons and rejected Petitioner's citing determinations made by the Workers' Compensation Board and the Social Security Administration, explaining that the opinions of those entities "are not binding upon the Comptroller. [read post]
