Search for: "Paul E. Winfield"
Results 81 - 96
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
., 116 N.J.L. 214, 217 (E. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:12 am
[N.J.S.A. 2C:43-12(e).] [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:27 am
NOTE from Paul G. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:39 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:43 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:16 pm
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:45 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:50 pm
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
Eq. 379, 393 (E. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
submit=rss_sho&shofile=11-1256_001.pdf … B-SDNY:Great end chart summarizes surviving Lehman alleg. v JPM w/both sides' positions & Ct rationale for no dismissal http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY: Cplt that JPM put “fin. gun to LBHI's head" etc by threatening to stop clearing services states valid claims… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:04 pm
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:06 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
Unlike spousal support, the UIFSA provisions pertaining to child support, N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.72(a)(e), permits forum selection with jurisdiction to be laid in a state other than where the order originated. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
., 130 N.J. 554, 574 (1993), the Supreme Court explained the rationale for allowing such expert testimony: [E]xpert scientific evidence concerning “battered-woman’s syndrome” does not aid a jury in determining whether a defendant had or had not behaved in a given manner on a particular occasion; rather, the evidence enables the jury to overcome common myths or misconceptions that a woman who had been the victim of battering would have surely left the batterer. [read post]