Search for: "Paule v. State Personnel Board"
Results 81 - 88
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
At its February 25 meeting, the Board will consider reversing its adoption of the protocol pending a legally required review of environmental impacts to forests and the climate. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
(For reasons that will become clear, the initial portion of this discussion needs to be told from the perspective of only one of us—Paul Rosenzweig. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am
The three WaPo stories, titled “The Permanent War,” address war-making aspects of counterterrorism – the drone wars and targeted killing, forward bases for drones in increasingly far-flung places, and (though with much less discussion) military and intelligence advisors to local governments dealing with various non-state actor groups that have both domestic and transnational aspects. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Minnesota is one of only a handful of states with third degree murder on the books. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
