Search for: "People v. Cohen"
Results 81 - 100
of 938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm
A couple of quick notes on cases that have been sitting a browser tabs in my ‘to do’ window for far too long… Daff v Gyalui & Aiach-Cohen (2023) UKUT 134 (LC) Ms Daff had been ordered to pay an RRO for an unlicensed property to the tenants in the amount of £22,230, being 100% of rent for 9 months. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
As usual, Cohen analysis is a must-read. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
” Law enforcement officials insisted on “backdoor” access, while Apple countered that encryption protects people from cybercrime. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
” Law enforcement officials insisted on “backdoor” access, while Apple countered that encryption protects people from cybercrime. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 10:54 am
In a recent case called Madden v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 12:41 pm
Trump, Stone v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:45 pm
In other words, can the state create a property interest that will allow it to prosecute people for wearing the wrong sort of T-shirts? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am
Cohen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
” — @mattwelch), yet more on trafficking-panic numbers] Group libel laws, though approved in the 1952 case Beauharnais v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:47 pm
” By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE, SARAH COHEN and KAREN YOURISH. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:42 pm
(See Griswold v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Golinsky v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:44 pm
In today’s case (Sauer v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
At Petro Cohen Petro Matarazzo, we have represented many auto accident victims over the years. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
They lure people into the truck. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 1:15 am
The hard working attorneys at Petro Cohen Petro Matarazzo take great pride in helping hard working people just like you. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
Ray Patterson concurred with Cohen. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
” And indeed the rules of conduct limit the ban on “offensive, disgusting or insulting” language to speech thattends to create or incite, or creates or incites, an immediate breach of peace, including ... personally abusive epithets, or words or language of an offensive, disgusting or insulting nature, which epithets, words or language when addressed to the ordinary citizen are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction of fear, anger or… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:17 am
(See, e.g., Cohen v. [read post]