Search for: "People v. Frye" Results 81 - 100 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm by Elle Rothermich
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and Frye v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
An Evidentiary Ruling, Even When Made in Advance of a Trial on Motion Papers, Is Not Appealable In Matter of Lyons v Lyons, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 2714210 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
Attorneys for 600 Land, Inc: Robert Frye, Indianapolis, IN; Scott Sikkenga, Kalamazoo, MI. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
  That is the general rule, I believe, but the odd facts of Frye v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
Frye (5-4):  Court holds that right to counsel extends to “effective plea bargaining. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
Bonnie Goldstein of the Washington Post’s She The People blog looks at Tuesday’s arguments in Miller v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:49 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
The “common-sense purpose” of the Kelly rule requires that it be applied whenever a party is trying to introduce scientific techniques that, though “new, novel, or experimental, convey a misleading aura of certainty.” People v Stoll (1989) 49 C3d 1136, 1156. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm by David Oscar Markus
Board of Freeholders, No. 10-945, asks whether people arrested and held for minor offenses may be routinely strip-searched.The court will also consider, in Maples v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:38 am
          Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeComplainant's Prior Grand Jury Testimony Found to Constitute Prior Inconsistent Statement People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
However, admissibility of scientific evidence is generally governed by FRE 702, along with precedent in Frye v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am by Susan Brenner
The Daubert Court rejected the earlier test that was used for this purposes, which came from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals’ decision in Frye v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
9 May 2015, 5:57 pm by Brian Shiffrin
  If your client has had many youthful indiscretions, pay attention to whether the prosecution will try to highlight his many children with many mothers, and try to limit that citing People v. [read post]