Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Of course, more people are at risk here in Texas for arrests on charges of federal illegal reentry crimes than in other parts of the country. [read post]

Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog - http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog

Remembering the Boldt Decision

12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff

Supreme Court had finally weighed in and the Indigenous people of Washington had won yet again.Charles Wilkinson was a legal scholar and advocate for Indigenous peoples. [read post]

Washington State Law Library - https://medium.com/walawlibrary

[Eugene Volokh] Alleged Neo-Nazi Loses Libel Lawsuit

12 Feb 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh

From Weaver v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Just Security’s Israel-Hamas War Archive

9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman

By Yousuf Syed Khan (@yousufsyedkhan) (October 17, 2023) Expert Guidance: Law of Armed Conflict in the Israel-Hamas WarBy Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw), Michael W. [read post]

Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/

When can a libel be defended as honest opinion? – Percy Preston

8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM

The publication in issue in Kemsley was an article written by the future leader of the Labour Party leader Michael Foot, attacking an article in the Evening Standard, a newspaper owned by Lord Beaverbrook. [read post]

Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/

A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case

8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh

Term Limits v. [read post]

SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/

[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"

8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh

Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize

7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman

Term Limits v. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize

7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman

Term Limits v. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II

6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude

He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"

5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude

" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Law and Media Round Up – 5 February 2024

4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM

The Claimants Michael Turner and Nikki Sanderson have sought permission to appeal the damages they were awarded. [read post]

Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/

:@WilliamBaude: The Objection that Enforcing Section Three is "Undemocratic"

3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude

As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”

3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman

This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment

2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy

Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]

Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/