Search for: "People v Bartlett" Results 81 - 100 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2010, 2:30 am by Eilionoir Flynn
See the seminal case in this area (Winterwerp v The Netherlands). [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
I ran into this dilemma the other day when discussing the classic case of Moore v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and North Carolina Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
  To my surprise, although a few people had written about it, see, e.g., Kenneth Duval, Burdens of Proof and Qualified Immunity, 37 S. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:56 pm by Frank Pasquale
If a placebo is chosen that produces a symptom, say dry mouth, the efficacy of antidepressants v. placebos is almost indistinguishable. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 pm
Bolten and his outgoing counselor, Dan Bartlett advised the President. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Eleonora Maria Mazzoli argues that, in a world where social media and search engines have become integral to how people find and access information and news online, an approach focused on a negative rights philosophy is insufficient. [read post]