Search for: "People v Bivens"
Results 81 - 100
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
See Bivens v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm
Citing Bailey v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm
Citing Bailey v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
For people on both sides of the class action bar, denial in these two cases represents a big missed opportunity to provide additional clarity on recurring issues. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
In Bivens v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
In Bivens v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
In Bivens v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:13 am
As a personal side note, there so many great people who have worked on this litigation since it was filed in May, and they all deserve thanks. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am
This term comes from the 1971 cased entitled Bivens v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
Between twelve and fifteen people worked in the building, as well as Nagle and Fink. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
A suicide bomber killed three people and wounded several others in an attack on a Saudi mosque, according to Saudi state television. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:35 am
Some cases, like D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:14 am
A federal district court in New York found plausible her Title VII and New York City Human Rights Law claims that after she criticized the new director’s qualifications and sought salary increases for her female subordinates, the exec fired her due to gender bias; they were not made implausible by either the same actor inference or the allegedly economic reasons for her termination (Bivens v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:28 am
There is no such claim.The case is Morales v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
If you want to know more about § 1983 and Bivens, see my recent article on the recent Supreme Court case, Minneci v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
After all, some of the retrenchment of Bivens in light of alternative remedies, including Bush v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
The Supreme Court denied the Bivens claim primarily on a no-entity-liability theory (foreshadowed in the public context by FDIC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
That is, they argued that § 2241(e)(2) makes Bivens actions unavailable to detainees seeking to challenge the conditions of their confinement, and relied on an Eighth Circuit case, Willis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
United States and NFIB v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:09 am
Pape (extending the Section 1983 cause of action); and Bivens v. [read post]
