Search for: "People v Deal"
Results 81 - 100
of 11,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2009, 6:17 pm
Yet people are obsessed with Blagojevich's penny's worth of corruption. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
You're dealing with my life. . . . [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
As well as the attitude of the Court towards these cases.Many justices on the California Supreme Court have "learned a lesson" from the Rose Bird recall and have adopted a correlative attitude when dealing with death penalty cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
You're dealing with my life. . . . [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:00 pm
And the illegal firearm is a big deal, as is the fact that it's being used in connection with a large scale drug operation: a classic no-no.Mr. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
Because I wouldn't feel free -- most reasonable people wouldn't feel free -- to leave with a lot less. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
"These provisions seem in desperate need of a Legislative rework, I think.There are separate statutory provisions that deal with driving while under the influence of drugs (prohibited) and consuming marijuana while driving (also prohibited) with which I have no real quarrel. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Their heroes were opponents of the New Deal. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
Unfortunately, though, that is what happened to our client in People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:53 pm
Here, there are two defendants, and the prosecutor offers a "package" plea deal to them; i.e., they both have to accept, or no deal. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
In LaPoint v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:15 pm
The post Skilling V. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:43 pm
Three bizarre decisions as of late, one which deals tangentially with no fault (Garcia v Leon, 2010 NY Slip Op 01538 [1st Dept 2010]), one which effects the safety of no-fault attorneys going to court in the bronx (People v Correa, 2010 NY Slip Op 01533 [1st Dept. 2010]) [...] [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
" That's self-defense, even though it's based upon a mistake of fact.You can see why we don't punish people for that. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:00 pm
"Admittedly, Matt Damon didn't go in for long; instead, he got the deal that led to the story. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Gloster v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Gloster v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
Currently, I only deal with robbery cases and violent serious assaults. [read post]
