Search for: "People v Duhs"
Results 81 - 100
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
Bonin describes the issue of incorporation with regard to the rights created by Heller as a "Duh! [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
Here was my post about the case’s first trip to the Court, back in October of 2006: Today’s Moment of Duh comes courtesy of the plaintiff’s decedent in the case of Phillip Morris v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
There will be rapid adoption of new ethics rules and issuances of ethics opinions related to metadata responsibilities in at least 50% of North American jurisdictions by year-end (I hope - what the heck are the states with zero guidance waiting for - get a clue people and guide your practitioners!) [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 4:59 pm
Um . . . duh? [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
In Eck v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 4:57 pm
New Fed Mortgage Cor v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 10:12 pm
Finance response: well, duh. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Because it's almost inevitable - rummage through enough documents and emails of enough people (a quarter million or so will do) and eventually you're very likely to discover somebody saying, or doing, or proposing something dumb. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:27 pm
To which I respond--duh!!! [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:27 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 6:55 pm
The only times I have broken this norm have been to deny the suggestion that occasionally surfaced in the right-wing press that as a law clerk I brainwashed Justice Kennedy into not voting to overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:48 pm
Lopez-Quinones v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
Furberg's piece doesn't attempt any fancy estimates of how many people have actually used any of the drugs that find their way onto these lists. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:17 pm
Duh. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:17 am
But interviews with people familiar with the lawsuit, and a close examination of court records, suggest that, at the least, the case raises troubling questions about the ethics of this new billionaire.Well, duh! [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:51 am
The response isn't always "duh. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
" Duh! [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:52 am
Earlier this week, the 6th Circuit in Warshak v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:04 am
So much , so duh. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:54 pm
Duh.)Second, the doctrine. [read post]
