Search for: "People v Dupont"
Results 81 - 100
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 9:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:35 pm
Feinstein, 734 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) and Dupont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:43 pm
Dupont, 933 So.2d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:16 am
Peter Turdin, Jr. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:10 pm
For example, in Crown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Bell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
, Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Levy was a top Supreme Court advocate, having argued 16 times before the Court and, in January 2009, won a 9-0 victory for DuPont in an important ERISA case (Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:38 pm
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:35 am
Dean Nora V. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
” Sellers was lead counsel for the female plaintiffs in the landmark gender discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
But, rarely do people report when thos [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and… [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
