Search for: "People v Henry O." Results 81 - 100 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2009, 10:16 am
Successfully sued suggests that these cases were tried to a verdict, which in the case of Grillo v Pettiete et al Cause 96-145090-92 and Grillo v Henry Cause 96-167943-96 96th Dist, Ct Tarrant County, TX, simply wasn't true. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm by cdw
” [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
On the same day, O’Callaghan J ordered that the proceeding be listed for a case management hearing on a date to be fixed in the case of Selkirk v Hocking [2023] FCA 432. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
& Koger (Dublin) Limited v O’Donnell, Woolman, Gross & HWM Financial Solutions Limited (part 1 here, part 2 here) into a single manageable blogpost. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
Interestingly, it is this last work—counselling “firm rule over people”—which grounds the insurgent common good constitutionalism, the New Right’s substantive legal theory. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
Of course, Crosskey’s originalism was of no use to these people. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
  Though there is somewhat tight control in Cuba itself (at least to the extent that the authorities care to press control--and that changes with weather conditions) Cuban authorities and Cuban people tend to also listen closely to the goings on in the exile community. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]