Search for: "People v James Price"
Results 81 - 100
of 431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Some have never sought recognition because their university has not offered it; others have chosen to give up the various benefits of recognition as the price of avoiding heavy-handed university regulation. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
“These types of apps attract two groups of people. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 9:17 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
But why not include Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Then again, from 1-800 Contacts’ perspective, $15M is a small price to pay for the ability to charge supra-competitive prices to consumers for 15+ years. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:10 am
James (1972), and recipients of small government subsidies, e. g., FCC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:55 pm
[PennEast v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm
FTC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
Social scientist James C. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Coinseed quoted one price to investors, which was not the same as the price quoted to Coinseed by its third-party trading platforms. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:32 pm
Summerfield Browne Ltd v Philip James Waymouth Neutral citation: [2021] EWHC 85 (QB) Queen’s Bench Division, Master Peter Cook Hearings: July 6, 2020 and January 18, 2021; Reasons: January 18. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
