Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Background In March 2012, Mr Khuja was one of a number of people arrested on suspicion of committing sexual offences against children in the Oxford area. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In that judgment (with which both Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson agree) the Court carefully reviews the history of Wilkinson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:01 am
Shannon Quadros wrote, in comments to Us v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Link to part 1- http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-jetivia-sa-anor-v-bilta-uk-ltd-ors-2015-uksc-23-part-1/ [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Lord Rodger agreed with Lord Hope, Lord Scott and Lord Brown. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:13 pm
I would assume that Smith (On Behalf of the Gypsy Council) v Buckland [2007] EWCA Civ 1318 is a way-station on the path to the House of Lords. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
The unanimous judgment was given by Lord Kerr (former Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland), with whom Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin and Lord Burnett agreed. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
He also claimed that leaflets published and distributed by police on 16 August 2010 which again contained CCTV images of young people involved in rioting identified the appellant”. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] 1 FLR 224, HL the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) held that a girl under 16 could validly consent to contraception “provided that she has sufficient understanding and intelligence to know what they involve“. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
No government could bring back slavery, or begin detaining people without trial. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:29 am
Lord Conrad Black, the former media baron, was sitting relatively pretty when the Supreme Court last year narrowed the honest services law in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes agreed with Lady Hale. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:58 pm
People usually claim to hate saying they told you so. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
” Lord Justice Leveson took a different view. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 10:40 am
The 2018 decision on the subject is Martin v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Lady Hale (Lord Carnwath agreeing) dissented in relation to A. [read post]
