Search for: "People v Norris"
Results 81 - 100
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am
So, if the ECJ had the power to fine us massively, yes we would have a choice ignore them (like we did when David Norris won his case before the European Court on Human Rights), but when is the freedom to do that cut down to such an extent that the executive has de facto no option but to comply? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
In Norris v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:31 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:24 pm
However, a lot has changed since 1922; professional sports leagues are now multi-billion dollar businesses that directly affect hundred of thousands of people. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:00 pm
The court cites to AOL v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
No, nor did a lot of people apparently. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
” People v. [read post]
ANTI-GUNS-ON-CAMPUS BLOWBACK: You know, I raised this issue with a Faculty Senate colleague and was…
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
I don’t know how many of these people might be alive today if just one of the several hundred people locked in Norris Hall had a weapon, but I do know that all of these people had a right to life and a right to defend it. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
People get hurt. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
" See also People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
This being only the second appeal for Norris, she’s certainly a piker compared to the defendant in the case last week, State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
In 2008, the Texas Supreme Court decided a case styled, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, PA v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
Of course, the criminalisation of homosexuality was discussed in Parliament in the same era and that didn’t stop the UK and Ireland from having to revisit that issue at the behest of Strasbourg decisions in Dudgeon v UK and Norris v Ireland. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
This is something we are all too familiar with in Ireland, where we have failed to take action in response to cases against other states when our own law is clearly analogous to the one impugned: one need only think of Norris v Ireland (ECHR 1988) for an example from our past. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
I blogged about that conference and the Declaration that emerged briefly at the time, and indeed Alastair Mowbray has produced a really excellent overview of both for the Human Rights Law Review which people with access to Oxford Journals can download here. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:22 am
Supreme Court decision in Hall v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am
The Court starts with Article 40.3.3 of the Irish Constitution, inserted into the Constitution by an amendment passed by the majority of the Irish people in a referendum, and interpreted by the Irish Supreme Court in AG v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
” People v. [read post]
