Search for: "People v Rodgers"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
” [28] Lord Rodger could see no reason why Parliament would have intended the position to be any different where someone will be subjected to deliberate conduct, or threats of deliberate conduct, that may cause her psychological, as opposed to physical, harm. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:10 am
Group 11 – Choice of Court and Arbitration V. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
Such orders were made in the cases of ASG v GSA, DFT v TFD, AMM v HXW and KJH v HGF. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
It's called Qaddura v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am
Lord Rodger delivers a separate judgment, agreeing with Lord Hope but adding observations of his own. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
” [76-77] In McKennitt v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
Homosexuals are as much entitled to freedom of association with others of the same sexual orientation, and to freedom of self-expression in matters that affect their sexuality, as people who are straight [paras [11] and [14] per Lord Hope and para [78] per Lord Rodger]. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In Ring v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
People held in prisons are one thing. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The novel was not a work of pure fiction, but included real people and information presented as “fact”. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Lord Rodger and Sir John Dyson SCJ delivered concurring judgments. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
Perfectly sane and apparently happy people throw themselves off bridges and in front of trains with no warning at all. [read post]
