Search for: "People v Sande" Results 81 - 100 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2021, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
On 9 February 2021,  in a groundbreaking judgment in the case of Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd v Reddell [2021] ZAWCHC 22, Deputy Judge President Patricia Goliath of the Western Cape High Court recognised that defendants may in principle raise a SLAPP defence in defamation cases. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 9:30 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
The Supreme Court recently heard its first big Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) case, United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am by Sean Quirk
Apart from shadowboxing PLA aircraft, Taiwan has been encountering another intruder: Chinese sand thieves. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
But recently the People’s Bank of China began to pilot a CBDC, Sweden is working on a proof of concept, and the Bahamas launched its “sand dollar” CBDC project. . . . [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Jessica Bassett is an incoming law clerk at Sand & Saidel PC. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Patricia Salkin
Troy Sand & Gravel Co v Town of Sand Lake, 2020 WL 421033 (NYAD 3 Dept 7/23/2020) [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The move comes amid growing U.S. scrutiny of the app, which allows users to create and share short videos of themselves with millions of people worldwide. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]