Search for: "People v Singh" Results 81 - 100 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
The Third Circuit just issued a precedential opinion in Singh v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 12:12 am
Espenilla, Judicial Fact-Finding Initiatives in the South China Sea Arbitration ArticlesPrabhakar Singh, Of International Law, Semi-colonial Thailand, and Imperial Ghosts Eliana Cusato, Overcoming the “Logic of Exception”: A Critique of the UN Security Council’s Response to Environmental Damage from the 1990–91 Gulf War Prabhash Ranjan, Police Powers, Indirect Expropriation in International Investment Law, and Article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT: A Critique of Philip Morris… [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Great coverage of Navtej Singh Jauhar v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am by HANNAH WILCE
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am by Jorrit Rijpma
In its earlier case law (D and Sweden v Council) on same-sex partnerships, the CJEU already ruled that these could not be equated with marriage. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Dicta in RM (AP) (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) (Scotland) (SC(Sc) [2012] 1 WLR 3386, [2012] UKSC 58 (which considered Regina v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:23 pm
The Delhi High Court seemingly walked that path in Koul v Estate Officer noting “refugees and IDPs appear to be similarly situated”. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Hayley Evans
The upshot of this issue spread is that people who engage in wrongdoing in weapon development and testing could be held accountable. [read post]