Search for: "People v Ventura"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Downtown News Online, March 26, 2010 Operators of the Downtown Standard hotel have pleaded guilty to violating federal environmental law following a Jan. 18 incident that caused a street closure and sickened several people in a subway station. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:04 pm
Had the co-workers' evidence been less similar, the court might have decided their admissibility a different way.The case is JOHNSON v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 29, 2009)Remanding bench verdict against 56yo rejected applicant's age discrim claim; District Court failed to evaluate statement preferring "younger educated people" as possible direct evidence>11th Circuit>> Birdyshaw v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:39 am
102, 1001; Palmer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:52 pm
Cases are accepted in the counties of San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, and Imperial. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
The case was People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:48 am
The trial court, Judge Riley (up in Ventura), agreed with the defendant, and thus denied the State's motion for judgment on the pleadings on defendant's affirmative defenses. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:38 am
Juana Ventura
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:19 am
Juana Ventura Subscription Required
ORANGE COUNTYCriminal Practice
Impairment of Grand Jury, Prosecutorial Misconduct Dismisses Indictment Against Public Officials
People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
(People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:09 pm
He cited the Third District's ruling in People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 6:00 am
County of Ventura (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 199, 209 (Community Memorial); see also People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. [read post]
