Search for: "People v. Arnold"
Results 81 - 100
of 532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
Surrounded by very intelligent people, I have always learned something I needed to know. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am
The tendency of English people to be understated in their use of language (other than on Twitter…) is often joked about with continental friends and colleagues. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
Canada In the case of Candelora v Feser 2020 NSCC 177 Joshua M Arnold J awarded damages under the Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act SNS 2017 following a finding that the respondents had engaged in cyber bullying of the applicant. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Guest Post by Colleen V. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
In an op-ed at The Appeal, Jay Willis calls Barton v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
One case is Haacke v. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 6:38 pm
In Oliver v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
For the two-week February sitting, which has trickled into the first week of March, most people would pick Wednesday’s abortion case, June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
A Petition entitled “Exploiting People in the Public Eye” has been launched demanding new and stricter laws to safeguard people in the public eye and has attracted over 150,000 signatures. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm
In Cash America [v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
The case is a follow-on to the similarly famous Masterpiece Cakeshop, involving a state’s ability to compel people with religious objections to same-sex marriage to use their artistic talents for such ceremonies. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 5:43 am
In the decision, the court dismissed Gilead's appeal and agreed with Mr Justice Arnold's decision in September 2018, which found that Gilead's SPC protecting its combination HIV anti-retroviral drug, Truvada, was invalid.Léon Dijkman reported on the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Hague in HE Licences v VG Colours. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:27 am
In Beck v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
Unlike the settlement agreement approved by Judge Patricia Seitz in the U.S. v. [read post]
