Search for: "People v. Atkins" Results 81 - 100 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Supreme Court has already ruled the death penalty unconstitutional in cases involving defendants with mental retardation (Atkins v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:01 pm by James Romoser
His legal team argued for years that Johnson was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 3:11 am
State, Patrick Charles Hannon v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In 1880, for example, it outlawed the categorical exclusion of Black people from juries in Strauder v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm by cdw
The California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:05 am by Kent Scheidegger
  CJLF wrote an amicus brief in this case supporting Texas.It was no surprise in the case of Moore v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 8:56 am by Dani Selby
Payne has an intellectual disability and that he meets all of the criteria for intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:17 pm by zshapiro
The State of Texas claims that the score of 61 was obtained on an aberrant test and that his real IQ is over 70. (100 is average) In Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by Ziv Steinberg
A decade ago, the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation in Atkins v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm by Tim Clancy
The appeals court made their decision to follow the holding of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]