Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 81 - 100
of 838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
(The New York Times picked up Justice Barrett's question). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
" Bruen continues, "In other words, this 19th-century evidence was 'treated as mere confirmation of what the Court thought had already been established.'" See also Justice Barrett's concurrence in Bruen, quoting Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
But in Lindke v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
For instance, then-Seventh-Circuit-Judge Barrett has derived from the historical sources a basic principle that "legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
As Justice Barrett explained in Biden v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In all likelihood, additional conservatives on today's Court also would have broken from Scalia in that case.I also tend to think that Justice Scalia would not have joined Justice Barrett's four-Justice Nance v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett also appeared sympathetic to Unikowsky’s argument that the court should not dismiss the case. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
It is asking the Court to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 landmark decision in Chevron v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
” Even Justice Barrett, who sees the major questions doctrine as an ambiguity canon rather than a clear statement rule, focuses not on Congress but the Executive when applying it in her Biden v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Influencers like Isabella Barrett, 15, are worth millions for “livin the life girl! [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:56 pm
EPA, and—most recently—Biden v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Yet he emphasizes that "we don't always line up 6-3, 5-4, the way some people tend to think. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Justice Barrett recently argued in Biden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
