Search for: "People v. Baxter"
Results 81 - 100
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm
Lead class action plaintiff objects when he realizes that the only people getting paid are the lawyers. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm
Here is a crazy quote: "Iqbal will have a more significant impact on American jurisprudence than Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:02 pm
Trump's philosophy in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
PARISIAN TRANSCRIPTS 2.0 We had a number of people send us material after our first post with out list of deposition transcripts (and various other items) concerning the testimony of the extremely active plaintiffs’ side expert, Dr. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 81 Cal. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 3:46 pm
See Baxter v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 11:47 am
In the landmark case Baxter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:49 pm
The headline of this post is a bit misleading in that, the court will determine only one facet of Jessica's law as implemented in California, it is with respect to civil commitment.7-10-2008 California:The California Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether a popular law that allows sexually violent predators to be confined indefinitely is constitutional.At their weekly conference in San Francisco, the justices voted 5-2, with Justices Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter in the… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
In Milwarde-Yates v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:26 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:18 am
V & VI. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm
The process should have thought and the decision made by people who are the experts within the company on such matters. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(2) During arguments, Justice Carlos Moreno had an interesting exchange that had echoes of Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:24 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:25 pm
Bethel, 854 N.E.2d 150 (Ohio 2006) (“there is substantial authority for the proposition that Miranda warnings are not necessary when counsel is present”); People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
PatLit's David Berry explains the significance of the recent Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling in Versata Software v Callidus Software on whether patent infringement proceedings should be stayed pending a post-grant patent review. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Justice Marvin Baxter suggested several times through his questioning that Prop 22 may have decided the matter, and that the court should not overrule the people on this question. [read post]
