Search for: "People v. Black (1984)" Results 81 - 100 of 221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
But below the radar, the Executive Branch is engaging in the same type of infighting—on issues that matter and have the potential to harm LGB people across the country.Attorney General Jeff Sessions filed an unsolicited brief in Zarda v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:19 am by Meg Kribble
The Frankfurter Papers are of special note because they reveal how the Supreme Court approached the Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” In 1984, Korematsu challenged the earlier decision through a writ of coram nobis in Korematsu v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Initially two black males entered the store, and they were later joined by a third black male. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:31 am by SHG
Some would argue that to blame the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, but not the Supreme Court’s decision in Mistretta v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:31 am by David Markus
")Overall, the language group's argument in Paramount v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by Donald Thompson
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Jennifer Davis
KF224.R33 U53 1984 Moscato, Michael and Leslie LeBlanc. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
By way of illustration, Ministry of Justice statistics for 2010/11 show that 40.6% of the people searched under section 60 were black, 26.3% were white, and 22% were Asian. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Markell’s greed placed his art gallery’s profits above the culture and heritage of the people of Thailand,” said United States Attorney Eileen M. [read post]