Search for: "People v. Bowman" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 3:15 am by Andres
Analysis Football DataCo v Yahoo! [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
The supporting briefs for both sides in Trump v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner)    Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
There’s also a useful “tl;dr” explainer by Sam Bowman and Geoff Manne (here). [read post]