Search for: "People v. Burden"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
However, the primary reason why people refrain from such action is concern relating to the cost. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(See People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Dedmon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Dedmon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Dedmon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 5:37 am
The case, Crawford v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm
In Crowe v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:00 am
So says the California Court of Appeals in the recent case of People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm
After a mistrial the first time around, a jury decided that the prosecution had not met their burden of proof and acquitted Lovelace of the crime. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:20 am
Supreme Court released a decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
The burden to establish consentIn People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, and those precedents make clear that people who become pregnant have the right to terminate a pregnancy before viability without undue burden from the government. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:50 pm
Candidate at Syracuse University College of Law and Intern at Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLPYesterday, the New York Court of Appeals decided People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
Nothing illustrates this as vividly as last week's 7th Circuit opinion by Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook in Mutawakkil v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Those are not trivial costs either.So the real questions are (1) what the Constitution requires (not what the statute says), (2) what's the best policy, for the individual and/or the state, and (3) which procedure is most efficient; a system that routinely enters mandatory orders that few people will ever pay and that burdens people and the system with their enforcement, or a system that takes into account ability to pay but requires hearings for those… [read post]
