Search for: "People v. Carr" Results 81 - 100 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2007, 9:31 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), to federal congressional districts. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am by Amy Howe
Carr, which helped enshrine the principle of “one person, one vote,” and Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Carr, 14-450, and Kansas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Abbott has two CGM devices on the market - the Freestyle Libre 1 and Libre 2 - which Abbott claims is the top selling CGM product in the world, used by 3 million people in 50 countries. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
On 9 July 2021 the Court of Appeal (Popplewell, Dingemans and Carr LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism [2021] EWCA Civ 1006 (heard 24 June 2021). [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:02 am by Kathryn Rubino
Our liberties depend on lawyers’ willingness to represent unpopular people and causes, including in matters adverse to the Federal Government. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Much of the discussion is centering on the impact of the 2005 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
"* The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark DecisionFormer GuestKat Mike Mireles and Kat friend Henry Liao dicuss the fresh court decision (from the Supreme People’s Court of China) on the Michael Jordan trade mark/name-personality case. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
An ICO investigation, prompted by complaints from the public, found the firm made repeated nuisance calls to people about PPI. [read post]
In their press release announcing their legal challenge, Krista Carr, Executive Vice-President of Inclusion Canada stated: People are dying. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 18 May 2023 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Carr v Carr. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
 This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
To the extent that some courts have determined that section 260.10 (1) requires that a defendant's conduct must be directly focused upon the child, or that evidence of a child witnessing a severe act of violence is insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction under this statute, those decisions are not to be followed (see, People v Carr, 208 AD2d 855, appeal after new trial 229 AD2d 446, lv denied 88 NY2d 1067; People v Suarez, 133 Misc 2d… [read post]