Search for: "People v. Churchill"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2011, 12:13 am
Churchill famously visited a bombed out East End in 1940, flashing his ‘V’ sign and said “We can take it”, to which a ‘luvable cockernee’ woman shouted back “You aint taking it mister, we are”, a comment conveniently airbrushed out of Churchillian history. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It was largely thanks to the untiring efforts of people such as these that the far-sighted and patriotic Churchill could find himself described in late 1930s Britain as “unquestionably the biggest war-monger in the world today” and as a man of the ‘war psychosis’ (both quoted in Richard Griffiths&rsquo [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Holmes was such a well-known wit that he suffered from the Mark Twain or Winston Churchill syndrome of having just about any commonplace witty saying of the day attributed to him. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm
His most famous speech comes from the case of Burden v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:23 am
In this scenario, and where the influential people thought that imparting education could be a good trade and where the politicians or the people connected to politicians own private educational institutions, the Supreme Court has stepped-in dealing with various important issues touching the people of this country and especially the talented and poor people. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 6:48 am
In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 5:50 am
In Downes v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
Putin dismissed him as an entertainer, but no one fully appreciated how media savvy Zelenskyy is: a modern-day Winston Churchill with a Zoom connection. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
Among the Allied leaders planning the post-war order, to be sure, Roosevelt (like nearly all his fellow Americans) was instinctively hostile to empire and colonialism, but that was scarcely the view of Churchill or De Gaulle, seeking to preserve theirs – or Stalin, seeking to create one. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
Karen Simone, and defense attorney Sarah Churchill. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In an apparent attempt to reverse the rogue decision, the majority of active judges on the Ninth Circuit authorized en banc review.[3] But because the Ninth Circuit has so many judges, it alone among the federal appellate courts employs a limited en banc review, where only eleven of its active judges sit en banc, consisting of the chief judge and ten other active judges who are randomly selected.[4] Accordingly, limited en banc allows for “minority rule” in a subset of cases,[5]… [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:03 am
Goodwin v UK (1996) 22 EHRR 123. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:44 pm
Indeed, in the 1936 case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:56 am
The catheter case, Riegel v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Cannon to right of them, Cannon to left of them, Cannon in front of them Volley’d & thunder’d; Storm’d at with shot and shell, Boldly they rode and well, Into the jaws of Death, Into the mouth of Hell Rode the six hundred [Blawg Review 141 was published slightly early after email exchange between myself and Ed of Blawg Review] Welcome Bienvenu Wilkommen Benvenuto Bienvenido to Blawg Review 141. [read post]
