Search for: "People v. Connell" Results 81 - 100 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 11:58 am by Orin Kerr
If the affidavit is accurate, then any remotely competent law school dean would recognize that the charges against him were based primarily on misunderstandings by students about pedagogical goals in teaching class.Perhaps the most remarkable allegation involves Connell’s teaching People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
So… hey, banker-people-that-read-me… I know you’re there… Google analytics, remember… are you starting to notice anything changing for you guys of late? [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf In a very interesting opinion last week in Byrd v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:27 pm by Kent Scheidegger
I do think Cadet O'Connell should get qualified immunity, though. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Keynote address: indigenous peoples and global climate change: intercultural models of climate equity. 25 J. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:37 am by Steve Lombardi
What special interests groups have succeeded in doing is convincing people the sky is falling because of litigation and especially by injured people. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:10 am
The court said that a closer approximation of Elmore’s situation was addressed in People v Carracedos, 89 NY2d 1059. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:21 am by Jeanne Hannah
According to the COA, in People v Redden [For Publication, decided September 14, 2010], under the MMA, a person may not be denied custody or visitation of a minor for acting in accordance with the act unless his or her behavior is such that it creates an unreasonable danger to the minor which can be clearly articulated and substantiated. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am by Elie Mystal
We thought it was kind of funny, but people who work in that office are not laughing. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court rulings on flawed jury instructions used prior to 1991.The 5-4 decision did not affect Hood's 1990 conviction in the shooting death of two people in Plano. [read post]