Search for: "People v. County of Santa Clara"
Results 81 - 100
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
County of Santa Clara. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:50 pm
County of Santa Clara (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 1327, that the plaintiff substantially complied with the Government Code’s notice requirements. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Exempt From CEQA Review People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 28 (1888) (corporation entitled to due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments); Santa Clara County v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
Read the unpublished decision at PEOPLE v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 12:56 am
" See County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:54 pm
" (People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Plaintiff cited County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:34 am
Santa Clara County, California, 22 Fla. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:37 am
(See People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:40 pm
See People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:17 pm
Supreme Court in the case of People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 28 (1888) (corporation entitled to due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments); Santa Clara County v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:39 am
A More Modern Form of the LLC According to the US Supreme Court in a case about twenty years after the 14th Amendment was adopted, Santa Clara County v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
The court held that, under California law (see, e.g., County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:30 pm
(See People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
We provide free legal consultations for bankruptcy in San Francisco County, Sacramento County, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Stanislaus County, San Joaquin County, Marin County, Solano County and throughout Northern California. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
City of Santa Clara, 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 (2011), because the approval was merely “a process for completing the Plan” and the 2012 MOU explicitly stated that “the County retain[ed] full discretion to consider the Final EIR and then to approve the Project, disapprove it, or require additional mitigation measures or alternatives. [read post]
