Search for: "People v. Curtis"
Results 81 - 100
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2009, 3:42 pm
Best scholarly treatment of the subject is Professor Michael Kent Curtis's No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights (1986). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Amount of judgment in Leviston v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
At 10:25 a.m., Kavanaugh has his first question, asking Bryn about her arguments relating to a 2010 Supreme Court ACCA decision, Curtis Johnson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Austin, Curtis J. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 11:14 am
With cause, Gideon likes to quote this passage from Justice White's* opinion for a unanimous court in Coffin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Thus far, only five people have not had comments published for this reason. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
" Is the assumption that such people have supernatural powers? [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
As a history of the Ninth Amendment, the book recapitulates the history of federalism in America and the idea that local self-government is a right retained by the people. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:34 am
The first time the words appeared, it was in an amicus brief filed in Williams v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Sullivan, supra; Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm
As outlined in People v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
Fogelson (2005) Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961 by Mark V. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times the court announced that “it would not hear a closely watched case on whether cities can make it a crime for homeless people to sleep outdoors,” City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
(Ehling v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
See McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 2:14 pm
But his meaning was clear enough: he meant he would not appoint the kind of judges who voted in the majority in Roe v. [read post]
