Search for: "People v. Erickson" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2011, 5:31 pm by Brian Shiffrin
And appellate courts have repeatedly rejected challenges to these arbitrarily time limits (see People v Jean, 75 NY2d 744 [trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting counsel questioning to 15 minutes in first two rounds and 10 minutes in third round of voir dire]; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 453 [2d Dept], lv denied 76 NY2d 985 [1990] [15 minute restriction in first round followed by 10 minutes in second and third rounds not an abuse of discretion];… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Here Brandsmiths' Andrew Lee pens a guest post on the dissemination of misinformation, or at least over-generalised information, to a wide audience of people who may not realise its true import. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:16 am by Blake E. Reid
But the only case Goldin relies on is a 1942 appellate case, People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Susan Brenner
And either way we decide, people are either going to be angry or people are going to be hurt either way. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:10 am by Stuart Kaplow
In this instance, 16 young people from across Montana, who were between 2 and 18 years old when the case was filed in 2020, brought their constitutional climate lawsuit, Held v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Weapon parody, however, is what most other people would call a satire. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:20 am by Michael Risch
Paul Heald (Illinois), Martin Kretschmer, and Kris Erickson (both Univ. of Glasgow) have posted The Valuation of Unprotected Works: A Case Study of Public Domain Photographs on Wikipedia. [read post]