Search for: "People v. Follis" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This post explores that point further; in particular how emphasis on technology, rather than people, falls short of that aim. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Third, the drug itself has harmed people. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
And that is something that people have now seen and it couldn’t be more clear. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:38 am
 Perhaps they are the sort of people who have to be really careful when they book their holidays in case they confuse Land's End with the conceptually identical Finisterre. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:42 am
Many affronts of the billThe definition provided in the bill not only goes against the grain of logic but also defeats the fine reading of third gender attempted by the 2014 judgement of the Supreme Court in National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (“NALSA”). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 6:13 pm
  My point is not that there aren't better and worse arguments based on religious sources but that people in all walks of life suffer from confirmation bias: Believing in the morality or immorality of the death penalty, or the necessity or folly of church-state separation, people will find in their holy books and traditions confirmation for their pre-existing views. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:04 am by June Casey
He plumbs the issues of campaign financing and corporate lobbying, revealing the human faces and follies that have allowed corruption to take such a foothold in our system. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
People read the Times in part precisely because of its editorial judgment, its ability to winnow the good and sensible views out of the vast mass of nonsense and folly; treating the Times as a common carrier would make it useless. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]