Search for: "People v. Givens (1985)"
Results 81 - 100
of 708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am
(Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2014) EWCA Civ 1438 (our note) and Richards LJ’s view that The disqualification effected by (the council’s policy) is fundamentally at odds with the requirement under section 166A(3)(b) of the 1996 Act to frame a scheme so as to secure that reasonable preference is given to people who are owed a housing duty under one of the provisions of Part VII. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
Underwood (1985). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 6:13 pm
See: R. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Query whether that sort of content classification is constitutional given R.A.V. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
Yesterday’s The Muslims of America, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
S. 52, 59 (1985). [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Soft Sheen Products, Inc., 486 A.2d 712, 725 (D.C. 1985); Wooderson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Rev. 257 (1985). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:01 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:11 am
Meanwhile you may want to have a look at section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. court cases landlord v tennants Yup, we’ve got those here. [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:12 pm
Tal (1985) QB 67, 81; Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 44 § 9: “puisne judges are not technically bound by decisions of their peers, but they should generally follow a decision of a court of co-ordinate jurisdiction unless there is a powerful reason for not doing so. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
As is well known, at the common law, following Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] 1 WLR 1985, “defamatory” incorporates a qualification or threshold of seriousness: “the publication of which [a claimant] complains may be defamatory of him because it [substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards him, or has a tendency to do so. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:42 am
While it is atypical for courts to find state action in a reactionary (as opposed to a "sting") shoplifting case, the Court of a Appeals, New York's highest court, found in People v. [read post]
