Search for: "People v. Grant (1999)"
Results 81 - 100
of 840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
District Court granted Xiaomi a preliminary injunction against their designation. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Read the decision at: Associated Developers Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
See Mota v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
(Granted, the Court acknowledged that the resolution of such issues was a highly fact-specific endeavor. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
In Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
A recent example can be found in Capitol People First v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Feb. 7, 2008), but rehearing was granted on other grounds (preemption), and the Despain opinion no longer exists. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Wouter Vandenhole; and Jingjing Zhang Pursuant to the Section Registrar’s notification dated 25 March 2021 that the President of the Chamber (Fourth Section) had granted permission under Rule 44 § 5 of the Rules of the European Court of Human Rights Duarte Agostinho and others v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 3:36 pm
., prostitution, possession of cannabis, possession of controlled substance, and carry/possession of a firearm between the years 1995 and 1999 (see People v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:30 am
The Board granted the petition in 1999 in Harjo v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Therefore Ms Yesiloz is saved by the Regulations from disentitlement under s. 115 of the 1999 Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:28 pm
S. 706, 758 (1999). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
acting in accordance with legal powers that have been granted to them by Parliament or the common law. [read post]
