Search for: "People v. Harris (1989)" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm by Steven Calabresi
Rev. 849 (1988-1989) (arguing for faint hearted originalism that did not overturn major precedents). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am by familoo
Today, I am told, the family members comprise 552 of a total membership of 8157, and the Assistant General Secretary, Harry Fletcher has responsibility for Publicity and Campaigning for the whole organisation. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Or are they representing and serving a class of people not reflecting the diversity of the public? [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Blackmun wrote in a 1989 dissent, “compassion need not be exiled from the province of judging. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]