Search for: "People v. Ives"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 3:38 pm
The lawsuit is captioned Charles Carreon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
This post is the fourth of a five-part series on litigation about mail voting during the 2020 general election. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
It is clear that most of the people chattering across the Internet on either side have never read the bill (arguably, many who voted on did not either). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:48 am
The FBI v. [read post]
[Ilya Somin] My New Article on "How Judicial Review Can Help Empower People to Vote with Their Feet"
13 Jan 2022, 2:09 pm
Finally, Part V discusses how judicial review can enhance foot voting through international migration. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
On a topic about which many people definitely feel strongly.So even though the whole opinion is worth reading, hopefully the first page will incentivize people to pour through the whole thing: (I've deleted the citations for easier reading)"Most states, including California, do not classify suicide or attempted suicide as a crime. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:18 am
The much anticipated preemption case, Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
On 12 October 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in Cooper v Evans & Anor [2023] EWHC 2555 (KB) in favour of the defendants. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
More on that in Part V tomorrow, plus some big picture thoughts. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
IV. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:52 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am
Self-confident people are usually not too concerned about what other people post on their social media pages. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:01 am
The issues presented by L.T.H. v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm
As the bill made its way through the state’s legislature, its critics argued that mifepristone and misoprostol are not dangerous and do not require the same level of regulation as Schedule IV substances and warned that the bill could create false perceptions around the medications and prevent people from accessing necessary care. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:40 am
In Part V, I conclude with a “realist” assessment of likelihood that the Supreme Court will actually find the mandate to be unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Williams at the expense of Walker-Thomas (Part IV and V). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
If Part III spoke to the issue of the governmentalization of law, Part IV touches on the legalization of government. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:45 am
Now the US Supreme Court in a case styled Utah v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
The police encountered twelve people at the home, but Bowen was not among them. [read post]
