Search for: "People v. Justice (1985)" Results 81 - 100 of 692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The CBA sought to bring the Model Code into alignment with the federal Divorce Act, RSC 1985 c 3 (2nd Supp), Canada’s ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (“UNCRC”) and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (“UNDRIP”), as well as existing family law “practice guidelines” (p. 1-2). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am by Jennifer Davis
KF7224.5 .C64 1985 Collins, Donald E. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
The late Justice Antonin Scalia restated the ancient common law rule in Deshaney v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Alito’s Dobbs draft approvingly quotes the late Chief Justice Rehnquist’s dissent in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
After all, in 1985, Alto wrote as a Justice Department lawyer that the Constitution does not contain a right protecting abortions. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am by David W.S. Lieberman
Greber, 760 F.2d 68 (3d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 988 (1985). [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Doing so--as Justice Brennan did in a dissent in a 1985 case--seems to lead to the conclusion that the Eleventh Amendment was meant to limit the scope of diversity jurisdiction but not (as in Hans and more recent cases) federal question jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, Lord Camden, rejected this argument with flourish. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
However, that did not stop the Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by Bush II appointee Chief Justice John Roberts, from holding in 2020 in Bostock v. [read post]