Search for: "People v. Kane"
Results 81 - 100
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Kane has now joined Judge Rakoff in calling for reform in the criminal justice system because too many innocent people are pleading guilty. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:55 pm
Jones, 214 Ill.2d187 (2005) and People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:22 am
This decision, McDonald v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am
The Condominium Association will take action through a group of people elected to serve in that capacity. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 1:57 pm
In Carrera v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
The 1985 Illinois case People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:49 am
See e.g., Ford v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:48 am
If it really comes down to Nixon v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:30 pm
Does Lane v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:58 am
The ruling came in the case of Whitewood v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:36 am
Thursday, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the statute violates the First Amendment (People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:06 am
Silicon Valley, or Cupertino v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
There is also an article about the case by regular Inforrm contributor Olivia O’Kane. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:27 am
In another case, an employee who ended a two-year affair with her supervisor and quit after she found out he was already married, sued the employer for sexual harassment (Kane v Honeywell Hommed, LLC, D. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
Kane v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
Not Justice Kane. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:29 pm
Justice Kane's opinion in this case seems right on target to me, and I'm not sure how the trial court thought it could possibly been otherwise.Pacific Engineering Company bid on a public works project (which was 99% of its work) and agreed to pay its employees prevailing wages. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:49 am
The requirement of full financial disclosure is so axiomatic to the family court process that one has to go back almost three decades to locate a case, Kane v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
Further, plaintiff failed to show how the alleged malpractice caused any such damages since the Letter of Intent was not a binding contract but merely "effectuated the intent of the parties" (Weksler v Kane Kessler, P.C., 63 AD3d 529, 531[2009]). [read post]
