Search for: "People v. Kavanaugh"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Brett Kavanaugh was hand-picked by the Federalist Society to provide a fifth vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Brett Kavanaugh was hand-picked by the Federalist Society to provide a fifth vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:21 am
The way to engage in civil disobedience to the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:38 pm
[an important point on judicial retroactivity buried in a footnote of Justice Kavanaugh's opinion in Barr v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:58 pm
Maybe lots of people in the White House thought that as well. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:31 am
Thus, I don't care if a nominee is a liberal or a conservative, or whether he or she supports Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:32 pm
Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
The cry here is that Judge Kavanaugh might provide a fifth vote to reverse Roe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:58 pm
I suspect that Kavanaugh and Barrett do not agree on the MQD, as Barrett's Biden v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm
[Justice Kavanaugh argues for historical practice as a check on judicial intuition] A quick note on a very interesting Supreme Court opinion last week in the religious liberty context, Ramirez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:39 pm
Monat Global Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:06 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Michelle Goldberg maintains that Kavanaugh’s opinion in Garza v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:31 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
Adam Liptak observes in The New York Times that “there is every reason to think a Justice Kavanaugh would continue to press one of his old boss [Kennedy]’s signature projects: dismantling campaign finance laws that restrict the ability of people and groups to spend money to influence elections. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” At ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia argues that “Kavanaugh’s 2014 dissenting opinion in SeaWorld of Florida, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:53 am
AFSCME, arguing that “compelling people to give money, by itself, is not a First Amendment problem but is rather akin to taxation. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
Or, at a minimum, shouldn't be.Take Brett Kavanaugh, for example. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:16 am
In Johnson, et al., v. [read post]
