Search for: "People v. Kiss" Results 81 - 100 of 324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2017, 3:57 am by SHG
  Either get the words out of your mouth exactly as shown or kiss it good-bye. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
First instance decision The case of Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2015] EWHC 2242 (QB) was heard before Warby J on 20 and 21 July 2015, with judgment handed down on 30 July 2015. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
First instance decision The case of Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2015] EWHC 2242 (QB) was heard before Warby J on 20 and 21 July 2015, with judgment handed down on 30 July 2015. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
First instance decision The case of Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2015] EWHC 2242 (QB) was heard before Warby J on 20 and 21 July 2015, with judgment handed down on 30 July 2015. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
 Specifically, it was found that 119 people had access to the records showing Sir Cliff was under investigation (making identification highly unlikely). [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Conservatives have said that they want to give people the power to demand that social media sites delete material that was posted when the user was under eighteen. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by SHG
” Elaborating ever so slightly, he went on to observe that the decision had been reaffirmed and that people relied on it. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:14 am by Jon Katz
Just as public kissing cannot be outlawed to shield others from observing the kissing, simulated masturbation cannot automatically be outlawed. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 8:04 am by Joy Waltemath
As to one of the cases, while that court stated that flirting, hugging, and even kissing in the workplace “are very ordinary things that people do and are not per se intimidating, hostile, humiliating, or offensive,” it then recognized that “[i]t is only when such conduct is both unwelcome and pervasive that [it] become[s] unlawful. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:11 am by SHG
Then they hugged and kissed, and all was well. [read post]